teamnimrod.net - Topic: The Original (Digital) Social Networking

D Eye on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:47:54 -0700

Fair enough. I bet you skip school a lot to don't you. Who say you need an edumakation?

travlestat on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:24:06 -0700

like i said i do not play wow that often im only like lvl 5 or something

D Eye on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:55:42 -0700

Trav, how do you manage to find the time to play all these games? I know I have more time than most to play when I feel like it, but damn.

travlestat on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:16:23 -0700

I do not know yet its just i like the idea of having backup with me that i can call out at any time. I might of been a hunter or druid. And I do not play that much I just got the trial. (Bio were are the free servers)

OriginalPrime on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:16:24 -0700

travlestat said:
I just started to play wow it is pretty fun. (Warlock for the win lol)

Warlock, huh? What other character type did you consider? Oh, and when the hell do you have enough time to play WoW?! That game is a time suck.

travlestat on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:22:54 -0700

I just started to play wow it is pretty fun. (Warlock for the win lol)

Bi0hazzard on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:00:44 -0700

I also love Blizzard games. Diablo II and WoW are my choises. I have found a nice free server for WoW. and My daughter is hooked on Starcraft. I realy prefer social gaming with the interaction. but some times you just need some alone time to game.

Bi0

D Eye on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:55:07 -0700

Well you're in luck then b/c Diablo III is has been announced by Blizzard. Blizzard loves us, they really love us. Between Star Craft II & Diablo III & the news that I read about the Map Editor in SC II being completely overhauled to being stupidly open to customization, like creating your own units, I see Blizzard making some sweet profit in the near future.

travlestat on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:27:48 -0700

out of all blizzards games i loved diablo they need a new one of them

D Eye on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:35:20 -0700

Bring back LAN for StarCraft 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can't wait to play Bioshock 2. Single player story was awesome.

Correction of errors: 2K games is taking part in this production, not Bethesda. I know, I know, they are both owned by Zenimax.

OriginalPrime on The Original (Digital) Social Networking

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:27:05 -0700

I came across a wonderful post on Kotaku postulating the death of single-player gaming. I was thinking along the lines of the article author, but stopped myself short when I considered just how long I’ve been playing games with other people. For those not in the know, the image to the left is of the original Warcraft. While I didn’t really play the first entry with anyone else it certainly prepped me for Warcraft 2, which I played the hell out of on many a LAN. My teenage years were full of hefting around beastly computers just so we could string piles of wires along the floor to play games like Warcraft 2, Quake, and Counterstrike. I’ve been playing socially since the early-to-mid 90s. Guess what? I never stopped playing single-player games. I’ve spent a great deal of time since then playing lone wolf in games like Mass Effect and Final Fantasy. In fact, Final Fantasy XII has taken up most of my game time for the last several months. I’m a sucker for good story and I enjoy taking the time to flesh out and explore worlds like those found in Elder Scrolls. That being said, I also consider myself to have sound business acumen. From the Kotaku article:

While successful, the addition of multiplayer to the multi-million unit selling BioShock may be illustrative of the changing expectations of consumers. If there's little to do but replay a narrative-driven campaign, many gamers appear quite happy to resell their discs and move onto the next game.

What they’re saying is that BioShock 2 is pushing multiplayer something fierce. We won’t know if the single-player campaign is adversely affected until the game ships, but I prefer to put my faith in Bethesda. They made an awesome game in BioShock and I expect nothing less from the sequel. However, I do understand the point-of-view of the publisher:

"The best way to combat people trading in your game is to simply make it better in whatever way works for you," argues Todd Howard. "People trade in cars with poor value. Our DLC is a good way to add to the value of the base game and give folks yet another reason to keep playing."

If your customer trades in that disc, then there’s one more used disc in circulation for someone else to purchase without having to purchase a shiny, new copy from the distributor – thus less revenue for the developer. Further, if the developer offers enough compelling content after the initial release then the more likely I am to purchase shiny, new downloadable content. Again, driving revenue for the developer. In recapitulation, I don’t think single-player games are going anywhere. Nor do I fault developers for trying to blend cooperative modes with franchises or genres which are traditionally single player. So long as Sqeenix keeps making stand-alone Final Fantasy games, I’m all set.